Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto
最近更新时间：2025-07-31
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-07222
状态：open
提交时间：2025-07-18 00:00:00
诉讼类型：商标
律所：HSP
原告：Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 1 | 2025-07-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The Court previously entered an order 13 questioning whether Plaintiff had met its burden of establishing that permissive joinder of 90 Defendants in this case was proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Plaintiff was granted leave to file either a supplemental memorandum, or an amended Schedule A and amended complaint consistent with that ruling. In response, Plaintiff filed 14 a sealed amended complaint with a sealed Schedule A as an exhibit listing 8 Defendants, 15 an exhibit to the amended complaint listing trademark information, 16 the declaration of Ann C. Trent which discusses how Plaintiff is harmed by trademark infringement, 17 a sealed exhibit to the declaration of Ann C. Trent with screenshots of the Temu website showing the infringing products for sale, 18 a memorandum in support of joinder, and 19 an exhibit to that memorandum identifying each Defendants' infringing product in the exhibit to the declaration of Ann C. Trent 17. In short, Plaintiff's joinder argument involves descriptions of the 8 Defendants selling the same product on Temu. Plaintiff presumably contends that such similarities support its conclusory allegation that Defendants' actions arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, but the Court remains unconvinced. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024) (finding that plaintiff had merely identified a |
